The Open office that you use today is actually Apache open office. Oracle gave the code to the apache software foundation. Many distributors including Ubuntu switched office suite from to LibreOffice.ĭue to the above reason, seemed down and out. ![]() Libre office is built on the original code base. Many of the contributors of this project left to form Libre Office. StarOffice office suite was renamed as Oracle Open Office. In the year 2011 Sun microsystems was acquired by Oracle. The project was assisted by Sun employees and volunteers offering the OpenOffice office suite to everyone. This free open office suite was known as Open. Sun made the Star Office software open source. In 1999, Sun microsystems acquired StarOffice office suite which was a proprietary office suite. It would be beneficial to know the history behind these two office suites which were built on the same OpenOffice source code. Summary Background to LibreOffice and OpenOffice Side by Side Comparison – LibreOffice vs OpenOfficeĦ. Background to LibreOffice and OpenOfficeĥ. Apache Open Office and Libre Office continue to release new versions.Ģ. was an open source office suite but separated into two projects, Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice. However, both are almost identical except for some minor differences which go unnoticed. Openoffice comes with less frequent releases and fixes while Libreoffice comes with faster fixes and features. The key difference between LibreOffice and OpenOffice is the frequency of updates and fixes. see ).Key Difference – LibreOffice vs OpenOffice There is also a move towards reproducible research which eschews office suites altogether in favour of Markdown or LateX more closely tied to statistical tools (eg. ![]() While LibreOffice has made huge headway in recent years in compatibility in this area, I have experienced problems with documents constantly going back and forth between MS Office and LibreOffice, usually culminating in MS Office refusing to open the file. Many academics rely heavily on MS Word and its track changes tools. If you are undertaking a PhD, one of your considerations should probably be what tools your supervisor(s), collaborators and external reviewers/examiners, are used to. These are potentially situations where otherwise minor formatting inconsistencies arising from translating from LibreOffice may be important. Likewise, most conferences will expect presentations in MS Powerpoint format. In the discipline of psychology, the vast majority of refereed journals require submissions, with stringent formatting requirements, to be in MS Office format. While I personally believe in open-source software, running LibreOffice on a Linux machine, I feel obliged to point out some issues which you really should consider. Well, M$O Word is better in this respect. It is search and replace in text documents. Just plain old good menu-based interface (oh, if you miss ribbons, turn on the side bar and enjoy).įor the sake of objectivity: there is one thing that I miss in AOO/LO. Tons of extensions let you finetune AOO/LO to your needs. At first, it may seem cumbersome, but as you learn, you realize that styles are great, they let you change a document in virtually a couple of mouse clicks. This is handy when you need to write/edit texts in specific fields of science/medicine/technology with lots of specific jargon. Not just adding words to custom dictionaries, but editing main dictionaries. I can (relatively) easily switch between variants (for example, with or without ё for Russian, modern or pre-1917 for Russian, taraškievica or nakromaŭka for Belarusian, Brazilian or European Portuguese, etc.). ![]() ![]() I can run spellcheck on languages that M$O does not even know (Esperanto is an example). Both Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice (AOO and LO respectively hereinafter) are rock stable as compared to M$O.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |